Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PATTLE, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by BATTENSBY, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PATTLE, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by BATTENSBY, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1972, Vol. 44, No. 11 1119-1127
© 1972 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

SOME EFFECTS OF ANAESTHETICS ON LUNG SURFACTANT

R. E. PATTLE, C. SCHOCK and J. BATTENSBY

Chemical Defence Establishment Porton Down, Salisbury, Wilts

The effect of anaesthetic and other vapours on lung surfactant has been investigated by four methods. Bubbles obtained from the lung were exposed in hanging drops to various concentrations of the vapours of ether, chloroform, and halothane. At 36.5 °C the bubbles lost their stability when the vapour had more than about 40% of its saturation concentration. Such a concentration is much greater than any used in practice. Organic vapours usually destabilize the bubbles when saturated. When a collapsed lung was reinflated with air saturated with certain rather insoluble vapours, it tended to collapse again; with other vapours it remained open. Mice killed with massive doses of insoluble vapours (e.g. pentane) showed lung collapse; those killed with more soluble vapours (e.g. ether) did not. Prolonged exposure of collapsed lung to saturated anaesthetic vapour did not prevent it from forming a lining film, but the film was somewhat abnormal. These findings are discussed in relation to anaesthesia, and it is concluded that collapse of the lining film would not occur in normal practice and would be a hazard only in the event of a gross overdose of halothane. It is concluded that acute massive collapse of the lung, as reported in the literature, is unconnected with the action of anaesthetic on the lining film. The means adopted to produce partially saturated vapours are discussed in relation to oil-gas partition coefficients. A method of testing bubbles for "clicking", using perfluoromethylcyclohexane vapour, is described.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.